Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Toby Martin vs Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Martin vs Schalkwyk analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Toby Martin vs Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Martin 1 - 0 Schalkwyk
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Martin has won 50.54% of points on their second serve, while Schalkwyk has won 50.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Martin, in recent form, has won 54.37% of their opponent's second serve points, while Schalkwyk has won 51.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.62% and 40.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Martin has saved 55.15% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schalkwyk has saved 68.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Martin has won 59.26% of matches played (W/L 32/ 22), with Schalkwyk winning 77.78% (W/L 7/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Martin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 122/ 105), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Schalkwyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 8/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Martin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.26% of matches (W/L 32/ 22), where as Schalkwyk has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 77.78% of matches (W/L 7/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Martin winning 1 times and Schalkwyk being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin winning 2 and Schalkwyk winning 0. The last match between Martin and Schalkwyk was at the M15 Hillcrest, 04-07-2024, Second, Hard with Toby Martin getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Martin and Schalkwyk have played a deciding set 0 times, with Martin winning 0 times and Schalkwyk 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Martin winning 0, and Schalkwyk 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Martin has played against opponents with an average rank of 63.61 while Schalkwyk has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Martin has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schalkwyk has won 100% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Martin has converted 43.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schalkwyk has converted 46.15% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
896
Rank
641
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
52% (317-290)
Career Total W/L
50% (8-8)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
78% (7-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Toby Martin vs Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Martin VS Schalkwyk
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Toby Martin | Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:0 | 1:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (33/53) | 54% (28/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (24/33) | 50% (14/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (10/20) | 29% (7/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (31/52) | 36% (19/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Toby Martin
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Toby Martin | Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 78% (7/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (35/23) | 74% (14/5) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (301/252) | 58% (103/76) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 65% (13/7) | 78% (7/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 40 | 22 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:33 | 1:25:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 78.37 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (879/1345) | 59% (329/554) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (563/879) | 66% (218/329) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (235/465) | 51% (114/225) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (73/168) | 46% (30/65) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (624/1432) | 45% (238/531) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 59% (16/11) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 62% (16/26) | 78% (7/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (17/15) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (17/2) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (2/0) |
Toby Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Lawrence Bataljin
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Toby Martin
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
James Beaven
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Toby Martin
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
15 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
71%
(
47 of
66)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
14 of
39)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
96)
86
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Oskar Brostrom Poulsen
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dusan Obradovic
Player
Toby Martin
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chirag Duhan
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve %
30%
(
3 of
10)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
14
Total Points Won
4
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Martin
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Parth Aggarwal
61%
(
44 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Philip Henning
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Devin Badenhorst
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Jesse Flores
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Luca Fantini
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Alexey Aleshchev
64%
(
61 of
96)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
105
Total Points Won
82
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Reuben Bakker
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
36 of
59)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Rankin
Player
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Vs Schalkwyk Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Martin are available here and Schalkwyk photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Toby Martin
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
